Form 12: Comparing Conflicting Non-Fiction Evidence and Validity Exercise

Form 12: Comparing Conflicting Non-Fiction Evidence and Validity

15 minutes 3 views 0 saves EN
Send as Assignment
Form 12: Comparing Conflicting Non-Fiction Evidence and Validity

Compare conflicting evidence from different non-fiction sources to evaluate their validity and overall arguments.

Questions

  1. MultiChoice

    What does it mean if two sources present 'conflicting evidence'?

  2. MultiChoice

    Source A tested 10 pupils; Source B tested 1,000 pupils. Which is more valid?

  3. MultiChoice

    What is meant by the 'validity' of research evidence?

  4. MultiChoice

    Which pair of statements shows CONFLICTING evidence?

  5. MultiChoice

    How should a researcher resolve conflicting evidence between two sources?

  6. MultiChoice

    Why might a study from 2023 be more valid than a study from 1950 on space tech?

  7. MultiChoice

    What is 'corroborating evidence'?

  8. MultiChoice

    Why might Source A be more credible than Source B?

  9. MultiChoice

    When evaluating source validity, why check funding sources?

  10. MultiChoice

    Which of these is a PRIMARY source of evidence?

  11. MultiChoice

    What defines a SECONDARY source?

  12. MultiChoice

    Why are primary sources often valuable historical evidence?

  13. MultiChoice

    A survey asked 'Don't you agree that dogs are awful?'. Why is this evidence invalid?

  14. MultiChoice

    What is an unbiased survey question?

  15. MultiChoice

    What is the overall goal of evaluating conflicting evidence in reading?