Evaluating Supporting Evidence: Relevant vs. Irrelevant Evidence Exercise

Evaluating Supporting Evidence: Relevant vs. Irrelevant Evidence

10 minutes 2 views 0 saves EN
Send as Assignment
Evaluating Supporting Evidence: Relevant vs. Irrelevant Evidence

Practice determining whether evidence directly supports an author's claim or is irrelevant to the argument. Learn to select the strongest supporting details.

Questions

  1. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Adding recess time improves classroom focus.' Which evidence directly supports this claim?

  2. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Banning plastic bags protects ocean life.' Which evidence is most relevant?

  3. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Owning a pet improves overall physical and mental health.' Which evidence supports this claim?

  4. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Switching to LED lightbulbs saves energy.' Which evidence is directly relevant?

  5. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Daily reading improves vocabulary skills.' Which piece of evidence is relevant?

  6. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Free bus transit increases public transit usage.' Which evidence supports the claim?

  7. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Composting enriches garden soil for vegetable growth.' Which evidence is relevant?

  8. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Fluoride in drinking water reduces tooth decay.' Which evidence supports the claim?

  9. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Protected bike lanes increase cyclist safety.' Which evidence is directly relevant?

  10. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Learning to play a musical instrument enhances math ability.' Which evidence supports this?

  11. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Installing solar panels reduces school operating costs.' Which evidence is relevant?

  12. MultiChoice

    Claim: 'Handwashing prevents the spread of illness in schools.' Which evidence is relevant?